The Dilemma of Applying Reputation Rights Norms in the Context of Information Authenticity and Its Institutional Optimization

-- An Empirical Study Based on Deep Synthesis and Text-to-Video Technologies

Authors

  • Fang Du

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/6erx1z74

Keywords:

Right to Reputation, Information Authenticity, Deep Synthesis Technology, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Technology Governance

Abstract

 In the digital age, the authenticity of information has become increasingly challenging to verify due to the pervasive influence of generative artificial intelligence technologies, such as deep synthesis and text-to-video. This has led to a proliferation of reputation infringement incidents. In the face of the crisis of information authenticity brought about by new technologies, current regulations governing reputation rights reveal several critical shortcomings, including incomplete identification of infringing parties and inaccurate judgment of infringing acts. To address these problems, firstly, providers of true information should also be included within the scope of reputation infringers and be required to bear a portion of the duty of reasonable verification. Secondly, the scope of assessment for insult and defamation should be expanded to account for cases in which the difficulty in discerning the authenticity of information leads to an initial surge, followed by a decline, in the social evaluation of individuals. Lastly, it is crucial to focus on the interconnectedness of regulations concerning generative artificial intelligence, information dissemination, and reputation rights, ensuring that these areas are harmoniously aligned to effectively protect individual reputation in the digital era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Pan Ji, From Reflecting Reality to Symbolic Framing: Assessing Information Credibility in the Networked Environment, Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), no. 11 (2018): 86.

[2] Wang Lusheng, On the Integrated Regulation of “Deepfake” Intelligent Technology, Oriental Law, no. 6 (2019): 60.

[3] Jiao Yanling, The Definition of Personal Biometric Information, Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), no. 3 (2023): 201.

[4] Cai Shilin, The Technological Logic and Legal Reform of “Deepfakes”, Political Science and Law Review, no. 3 (2020): 132.

[5] Oscar Schwartz, Technology can make it look as if anyone has said or done anything. Is it the next wave of (mis) information warfare? (Mon 12 Nov 2018), Available:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/12/deep-fakes-fake-news-truth.

[6] India Today Web Desk, I was vomiting: Journalist Rana Ayyub reveals horrifying account of deepfake porn plot,(Nov 21, 2018), Available:

https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-news/story/journalist-rana-ayyub-deepfake-porn-1393423-2018-11-21.

[7] Kugler, M. B., Pace, Carly. (2021). Deepfake privacy: attitudes and regulation. Northwestern University Law Review, 116(3), 611.

[8] Digitaltrends Web, OpenAI’s new AI-made videos are blowing people’s minds, (February 15, 2024), Available: https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/openai-sora-text-to-video-generator/.

[9] Shi Anbin, Zheng En, Entering “Fusion Reality”: The Reshaping of the News Media Landscape by Text-to-Video Technology, Media Observation, no. 4 (2024): 31.

[10] Xinhua News Agency, Directly Generating 16-Second HD Video: China's Self-Developed Video Large Model Released in Beijing, available: http://www.xinhuanet.com/20240427/96747214b15b4138a2709f9f65cf503d/c.html.

[11] EMO, Emote Portrait Alive - Generating Expressive Portrait Videos with Audio 2 Video Diffusion Model under Weak Conditions, available: https://humanaigc.github.io/emote-portrait-alive/.

[12] Beijing Internet Court Civil Judgment No. 9526 (2020).

[13] Beijing Internet Court Civil Judgment No. 11223 (2023).

[14] Sun Lianbin, Exploration of the Paradigm of Tort Liability Objects in the Era of Self-Media, People's Forum·Academic Frontiers, 2020, pp. 122-123.

[15] Wang Yuting, Qin Qianhong, Public Interest Defense in Defamation Cases: Special Exemptions for News Reporting and Public Opinion Supervision, Hebei Law Science, 2022, pp. 180.

[16] Zhu Hongbing, On the Right to Reputation of Citizens, Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), No. 2, 2003, p. 225.

[17] Wang Zejian, Characteristics and Interpretation of Chinese Civil Law, Legal Application, No. 13, 2020, p. 12.

[18] Zhu Xiaofeng, On the Elements and Interest Balancing in the Determination of Personality Rights Infringement Liability, Law Review, No. 1, 2024, p. 109.

[19] Wang Liming, The Right to Reply in the Era of Self-Media, Oriental Law, No. 4, 2023, p. 71.

[20] Liu Wenjie, Exploration and Innovation of the Civil Code in Defenses against News Infringement, Journalist, No. 9, 2020, p. 64.

[21] Xuan Gang, Yan Haiyan, Chaos and Regulation: An Empirical Analysis of Defamation in Self-Media Communication, Hubei Social Sciences, No. 7, 2022, pp. 123, 137.

[22] Yin Jun, Research on the Liability Principles of Japanese News Reporting Infringing on the Right to Reputation, Journalist, No. 11, 2015, p. 89.

[23] Wang Ranran, Wen Xueguo, Defenses Against Infringement of Personal Information Disclosure in the Self-Media Era—With Reference to the “News Value Test” in the United States, Henan Social Sciences, No. 11, 2020, p. 15.

[24] Deng Jianpeng, Zhao Zhisong, Risks and Three-Dimensional Regulation of Text-to-Video Artificial Intelligence: A Perspective from Sora, Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), No. 6, 2024, p. 94.

[25] Wang Liming, Cheng Xiao, Zhu Hu, Interpretation of the Personality Rights Section of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, China Legal Publishing House, 2020, pp. 388-390.

[26] Lu Qing, Identity Construction and Legal Protection in the Digital Age: Reflections Centered on Personal Information Protection, Legal Studies, No. 5, 2021, p. 13.

[27] Yang Lixin, Controversial Issues in Civil and Commercial Law Theory—Compensation for Moral Damages, China Renmin University Press, 2004, p. 286.

[28] Luo Xiang, Zhang Huimin, Homogenized Evaluation and Selective Application of Insult/Defamation Crimes in Cyberspace Governance, Jianghuai Tribune No. 5 (2023), p. 124.

Downloads

Published

25-02-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Du, F. (2025). The Dilemma of Applying Reputation Rights Norms in the Context of Information Authenticity and Its Institutional Optimization: -- An Empirical Study Based on Deep Synthesis and Text-to-Video Technologies. Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management, 16(1), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.54097/6erx1z74