Coordinating Digital-Driven Rural Industrial Integration in Sichuan’s Ethnic Minority Areas: A Multi-Actor Governance Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/cmn3z586Keywords:
Rural industrial integration, Multi-actor governance, Policy sequencing, Digital platforms, Ethnic minority areasAbstract
Studies of rural digitalization commonly identify infrastructure gaps, limited skills, and fragmented resources, but listing these constraints does not specify how public and private actors should coordinate their responses. Focusing on the ethnic minority areas of Sichuan Province, China, this paper develops a multi-actor governance framework for digital-driven rural industrial integration. It distinguishes five actor groups—local governments, producer organizations, processing and service enterprises, digital platforms, and rural households—and considers the incentives and coordination failures that may arise among them. Building on polycentric governance and collective-action scholarship, the paper proposes a phased policy sequence: diagnose binding constraints and establish basic safeguards; develop producer capabilities and stable cross-industry relationships; and support differentiated value creation with outcome-based evaluation. It also recommends assessing integration through durable economic linkages, participation, and benefit distribution rather than infrastructure coverage or online sales alone. The framework does not claim to evaluate current programs empirically. Instead, it specifies responsibilities, sequencing principles, and criteria that can guide subsequent local implementation and research.
Downloads
References
[1] Hong, Q., & Su, J. (2024). The impact of rural e-commerce platforms on the transformation of industrial structure: Evidence from China. Review of Development Economics, 28(3), 1267-1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13100
[2] General Office of the People's Government of Sichuan Province. (2023). Action plan for the integration of primary, secondary and tertiary industries in rural Sichuan (Chuanbanfa [2023] No. 43) [in Chinese]. https://www.sc.gov.cn/zfgbdb/detail/c0b365408dac45c7a1949e4e97257772.shtml
[3] Zhang, Y. A. (2024). The internal mechanisms, practical constraints and solutions for the digital transformation of rural industries in Liangshan Prefecture [in Chinese]. Journal of Xichang University (Social Science Edition), 36(4), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.16104/j.issn.1673-1883.2024.04.003
[4] Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641-672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
[5] Markelova, H., Meinzen-Dick, R., Hellin, J., & Dohrn, S. (2009). Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy, 34(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.001
[6] Zhang, S., & Qiu, Z. (2024). Why is rural E-commerce successful? A sociological analysis of the mechanism for actualizing technological dividends. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 11, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00205-5
[7] You, T., & Zhang, R. (2026). Under-platformization: Platform literacy and the interplay between multiple actors in developing rural e-commerce in Central and Western China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 13, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-026-00272-4
[8] Zhang, L. (2021). Platformizing family production: The contradictions of rural digital labor in China. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32(3), 341-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/10353046211037093
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








