Dynamic Inference of Regional Traffic States in a Dense Waterway Using AIS Window Sequences

Authors

  • Enze Wu School of Information Engineering, Jiangsu Maritime Institute, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r4bkk033

Keywords:

Automatic identification system, Dense waterway, Dynamic inference, Gradient boosting, Regional traffic state, Short-term prediction

Abstract

Regional vessel monitoring requires both a description of current traffic and an estimate of its near-term evolution. This study evaluates a lightweight approach to dynamic traffic-state inference using sequences of Automatic Identification System (AIS) observations. A lower Yangtze waterway case area is divided into spatial cells, and vessel-level observations are aggregated into 10-minute windows. The inference target is the proportion of observed vessels with mean speed below 2 kn in a future window. A gradient-boosted tree model combines current traffic summaries with two preceding windows. Experiments use previously extracted observations representing 1,806,306 AIS messages and 6,014 vessel identities over approximately 4.7 days, with chronological training, validation and test periods. On 7,094 test samples, the 10-minute forecast achieves a mean absolute error of 0.0719, compared with 0.0810 for persistence and 0.0762 for a current-window model. These correspond to relative reductions of 11.2% and 5.7%. Accuracy for three operational traffic states reaches 81.15%. The advantage in continuous prediction remains at 20- and 30-minute horizons, although abrupt changes remain difficult. The results support adding short histories to vessel-window monitoring in this case area. The inferred states describe observed speed composition and should not be interpreted as independently validated congestion or collision-risk levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Tu, E., Zhang, G., Rachmawati, L., Rajabally, E., & Huang, G. (2018). Exploiting AIS data for intelligent maritime navigation: A comprehensive survey from data to methodology. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(5), 1559-1582. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2724551

[2] Emmens, T., Amrit, C., Abdi, A., & Ghosh, M. (2021). The promises and perils of Automatic Identification System data. Expert Systems with Applications, 178, Article 114975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114975

[3] Zhao, L., Shi, G., & Yang, J. (2018). Ship trajectories pre-processing based on AIS data. Journal of Navigation, 71(5), 1210-1230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000188

[4] Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Zheng, Z., & Yu, X. (2022). A molecular dynamics approach to identify the marine traffic complexity in a waterway. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(11), Article 1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111678

[5] Yu, H., Meng, Q., Fang, Z., Liu, J., & Xu, L. (2022). A review of ship collision risk assessment, hotspot detection and path planning for maritime traffic control in restricted waters. Journal of Navigation, 75(6), 1337-1363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463322000650

[6] Li, H., Jiao, H., & Yang, Z. (2023). AIS data-driven ship trajectory prediction modelling and analysis based on machine learning and deep learning methods. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 175, Article 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103152

[7] March, D., Metcalfe, K., Tintoré, J., & Godley, B. J. (2021). Tracking the global reduction of marine traffic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Communications, 12(1), Article 2415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22423-6

[8] Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451

[9] Bergmeir, C., Hyndman, R. J., & Koo, B. (2018). A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 120, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2017.11.003

[10] Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 679-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001

Downloads

Published

29-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles