Advances in UAV Visual Navigation for Low-Altitude Air Traffic Safety: An Integrated Perspective on Perception, Decision-Making, and Traffic Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/999rmg52Keywords:
Visual navigation, Detect and avoid, Conflict detection and resolution, Operational risk assessmentAbstract
As applications such as logistics delivery, urban air mobility, emergency response, and infrastructure inspection expand, low-altitude UAV operations are shifting from dispersed, low-density flights toward large-scale, high-density operations. Visual navigation, owing to its low weight, low cost, and limited dependence on external infrastructure, has become a key enabling technology for autonomous localization, environmental perception, and obstacle avoidance when global navigation satellite system signals are degraded or unavailable. From the perspective of low-altitude air traffic safety, however, improvements in the performance of individual vision algorithms do not automatically translate into safe system-level operations. Visual observations must be converted into conflict assessments, safety-critical decisions, exchangeable information, and operationally manageable states before a closed safety loop can be established. This review examines UAV visual navigation through three interrelated dimensions: perception capability, decision safety, and compatibility with traffic management. It synthesizes research on visual simultaneous localization and mapping and visual-inertial odometry, object detection and tracking, depth estimation, conflict detection, autonomous avoidance, low-altitude traffic management, operational risk assessment, and safety assurance. Particular attention is given to the propagation of visual-perception uncertainty into safety-critical decisions, the transformation of onboard visual outputs into information that can be used by low-altitude traffic management systems, and the assurance of learning-based vision systems. The review indicates that the main bottlenecks are shifting from the accuracy of individual algorithms to cross-layer metric alignment, standardization of visual safety information, interoperability among heterogeneous systems, and certification of learning-based perception. Future research should therefore extend beyond algorithmic optimization toward operational risk management and regulatory oversight by developing safety-consequence-oriented metrics, standardized information interfaces, runtime assurance mechanisms, and digital-twin-based validation integrated with flight testing.
Downloads
References
[1] Bauranov, A., & Rakas, J. (2021). Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 125, Article 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100726
[2] Hamissi, A., & Dhraief, A. (2024). A survey on the unmanned aircraft system traffic management. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3), Article 68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3617992
[3] Yang, J., Wang, Y., Hang, X., Li, H., & Zhang, W. (2024). A review on airspace design and risk assessment for urban air mobility. IEEE Access, 12, 157599-157611. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3481148
[4] Zhuang, L., Zhong, X., Xu, L., Wang, H., & Chen, Y. (2024). Visual SLAM for unmanned aerial vehicles: Localization and perception. Sensors, 24(10), Article 2980. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24102980
[5] Koukiou, G., & Anastassopoulos, V. (2023). UAV sensors autonomous integrity monitoring—SAIM. Electronics, 12(3), Article 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030746
[6] Tang, P., Li, J., & Sun, H. (2024). A review of electric UAV visual detection and navigation technologies for emergency rescue missions. Sustainability, 16(5), Article 2105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052105
[7] Butt, M. Z., Nasir, N., Rashid, R. B. A., Khan, M. A., & Iqbal, S. (2024). A review of perception sensors, techniques, and hardware architectures for autonomous low-altitude UAVs in non-cooperative local obstacle avoidance. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 173, Article 104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2024.104629
[8] Padhy, R. P., Sa, P. K., Narducci, F., Sharma, A., & Biswas, S. (2024). Monocular vision-aided depth measurement from RGB images for autonomous UAV navigation. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 20(2), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550485
[9] Chandran, N. K., Sultan, M. T. H., Łukaszewicz, A., Krzysztofik, J., & Józwik, J. (2023). Review on type of sensors and detection method of anti-collision system of unmanned aerial vehicle. Sensors, 23(15), Article 6810. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156810
[10] Fasano, G., & Opromolla, R. (2023). Analytical framework for sensing requirements definition in non-cooperative UAS sense and avoid. Drones, 7(10), Article 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7100621
[11] Estevez, J., Nuñez, E., Lopez-Guede, J. M., Garate, G., & Graña, M. (2024). A low-cost vision system for online reciprocal collision avoidance with UAVs. Aerospace Science and Technology, 150, Article 109190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109190
[12] Fitrikananda, B. P., Jenie, Y. I., Sasongko, R. A., & Muhammad, H. (2023). Risk assessment method for UAV's sense and avoid system based on multi-parameter quantification and Monte Carlo simulation. Aerospace, 10(9), Article 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10090781
[13] Jenie, Y. I., van Kampen, E. J., Ellerbroek, J., & Hoekstra, J. M. (2017). Taxonomy of conflict detection and resolution approaches for unmanned aerial vehicle in an integrated airspace. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(3), 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2580219
[14] Gugan, G., & Haque, A. (2023). Path planning for autonomous drones: Challenges and future directions. Drones, 7(3), Article 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7030169
[15] Kalidas, A. P., Joshua, C. J., Md, A. Q., Basheer, S., Mohan, S., & Suchithra, M. (2023). Deep reinforcement learning for vision-based navigation of UAVs in avoiding stationary and mobile obstacles. Drones, 7(4), Article 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7040245
[16] Tang, J., Lao, S., & Wan, Y. (2022). Systematic review of collision-avoidance approaches for unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Systems Journal, 16(3), 4356-4367. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2021.3101283
[17] Xue, J., Zhu, J., Du, J., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2023). Dynamic path planning for multiple UAVs with incomplete information. Electronics, 12(4), Article 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040980
[18] Panov, I., & Ul Haq, A. (2024). A critical review of information provision for U-Space traffic autonomous guidance. Aerospace, 11(6), Article 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11060471
[19] Wiedemann, M., Liang, M., Keremane, G., & Bräunl, T. (2024). Advanced air mobility: A comparative review of policies from around the world—Lessons for Australia. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 24, Article 100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100988
[20] Ali, B. S., Saji, S., & Su, M. T. (2022). An assessment of frameworks for heterogeneous aircraft operations in low-altitude airspace. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 37, Article 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100528
[21] Li, S., Cheng, X., Huang, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). Cooperative conflict detection and resolution and safety assessment for 6G enabled unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(2), 2183-2198. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3137458
[22] Sanchez-Aguero, V., Gonzalez, L. F., Valera, F., Vidal, I., & Lopez, D. (2021). Cellular and virtualization technologies for UAVs: An experimental perspective. Sensors, 21(9), Article 3093. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093093
[23] Alshaibani, W. T., Shayea, I., Caglar, R., Alhammadi, A., & Daradkeh, Y. I. (2022). Mobility management of unmanned aerial vehicles in ultra-dense heterogeneous networks. Sensors, 22(16), Article 6013. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166013
[24] Meng, K., Wu, Q., Xu, J., Chen, W., & Li, J. (2024). UAV-enabled integrated sensing and communication: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Wireless Communications, 31(2), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.131.2200442
[25] Woolsey, A. A. (2022). Novel technology methods of enterprise unmanned traffic management (E-UTM) solutions for mining. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 39(6), 2365-2378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-022-00687-w
[26] Aldaej, A., Ahanger, T. A., Atiquzzaman, M., & Ullah, I. (2022). Smart cybersecurity framework for IoT-empowered drones: Machine learning perspective. Sensors, 22(7), Article 2630. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072630
[27] Yaacoub, J. P., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., & Chehab, A. (2020). Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations. Internet of Things, 11, Article 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218
[28] Charnsethikul, C., Silva, J. M., Verhagen, W. J. C., & Santos, B. F. (2025). Urban air mobility aircraft operations in urban environments: A review of potential safety risks. Aerospace, 12(4), Article 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12040306
[29] Alharbi, A., Petrunin, I., & Panagiotakopoulos, D. (2023). Assuring safe and efficient operation of UAV using explainable machine learning. Drones, 7(5), Article 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7050327
[30] Wang, S., Zhan, X., Zhai, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Enhancing navigation integrity for urban air mobility with redundant inertial sensors. Aerospace Science and Technology, 126, Article 107631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107631
[31] Rampriya, R. S., Al-Shehari, T., Nathan, S., & Al-Razgan, M. (2024). An unmanned aerial vehicle captured dataset for railroad segmentation and obstacle detection. Scientific Data, 11, Article 1315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03952-3
[32] Souanef, T., Al-Rubaye, S., Tsourdos, A., & Savvaris, A. (2023). Digital twin development for the airspace of the future. Drones, 7(7), Article 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070484
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








