A Review of Wearable ECG System Design and Key Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/5tdjc368Keywords:
Wearable electrocardiogram, Bioelectric signal acquisition, Analog front end, Σ-Δ analog-to-digital converter, Wireless communicationAbstract
Wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring has attracted increasing attention as cardiovascular diseases remain a major global health concern and long-term physiological monitoring is shifting from clinical settings to daily life. Despite recent advances in wearable healthcare technologies, reliable and low-power ECG acquisition remains challenging due to the low amplitude of biopotential signals, motion-induced artifacts, common-mode interference, and strict energy constraints. Many existing studies focus on individual components, such as electrodes, analog front-ends, or wireless communication modules, while system-level interactions and design trade-offs are less frequently addressed. This paper reviews the key engineering considerations involved in wearable ECG system design from a system-level perspective. The discussion covers the characteristics of ECG biopotentials and the evolution of electrode technologies, weak-signal acquisition and conditioning techniques in analog front-ends, Σ-Δ analog-to-digital conversion for narrow-band ECG signals, and commonly used wireless communication approaches for long-term monitoring. In addition, architectural trade-offs between distributed and integrated hardware implementations are discussed. Overall, this review aims to provide a coherent overview of how different design choices jointly influence performance, robustness, and energy efficiency in wearable ECG systems.
Downloads
References
[1] World Health Organization. (2025). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
[2] Xie, H., Yang, L., Jiang, B., Huang, Z., Chen, Y., & Zhang, W. (2025). State-of-the-art wearable sensors for cardiovascular health: A review. npj Cardiovascular Health. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44325-025-00030-z
[3] Sana, F., Isselbacher, E. M., Singh, J. P., Heist, E. K., Pathik, B., Armoundas, A. A., & Turakhia, M. P. (2020). Wearable devices for ambulatory cardiac monitoring: JACC state-of-the-art review. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 6(8), 1007-1021. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7316129/
[4] Kligfield, P., Gettes, L. S., Bailey, J. J., Childers, R., Deal, B. J., Hancock, E. W., van Herpen, G., Kors, J. A., Macfarlane, P., Mirvis, D. M., Pahlm, O., Rautaharju, P., & Wagner, G. S. (2007). Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Circulation, 115(10), 1306-1324. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180200
[5] Kim, H., Kim, E., Choi, C., & Yeo, W.-H. (2022). Advances in soft and dry electrodes for wearable health monitoring devices. Micromachines, 13(4), Article 629. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/13/4/629
[6] Joutsen, A., Cömert, A., Kaappa, E., Vanhatalo, K., Riistama, J., & Eskola, H. (2024). ECG signal quality in intermittent long-term dry electrode recordings with controlled motion artifacts. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 8882. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-56595-0
[7] Xue, S., Gao, S., & Zhou, P. (2015). Design and implementation of a wearable ECG monitoring system. China Medical Devices, 30(1), 6-9. [In Chinese]. https://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail?id=PeriodicalPaper_ylsbxx201501002
[8] Zhang, B., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, J. (2024). Design and implementation of a wearable wireless chest-patch monitoring terminal. Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation, 48(5), 561-567. [In Chinese]. https://zgylqxzz.xml-journal.net/cn/article/doi/10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.230581
[9] Texas Instruments. (2020). ADS1291, ADS1292, and ADS1292R low-power, two-channel, 24-bit analog front-end for biopotential measurements datasheet (Rev. C). https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/sbas502b/sbas502b.pdf
[10] Adafruit. (2014). Introduction to Bluetooth Low Energy: GATT. https://learn.adafruit.com/introduction-to-bluetooth-low-energy/gatt
[11] Texas Instruments. (2024). GATT services and BLE-Stack user guide. https://software-dl.ti.com/lprf/sdg-latest/html/ble-stack-3.x/gatt.html
[12] Bulić, P., Klobučar, G., & Biasizzo, A. (2019). Data transmission efficiency in Bluetooth Low Energy versions. Sensors, 19(17), Article 3746. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/17/3746
[13] Fourati, L. C., Ayedi, M., Fourati, L., & Ellouze, N. (2020). Remote health monitoring systems based on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) communication systems. Electronics, 9(7), Article 1089. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7313288/
[14] Spörk, M., Boano, C. A., & Römer, K. (2019). Performance and trade-offs of the new PHY modes of BLE 5. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Pervasive Systems in the IoT Era (PERSIST-IoT 2019). https://www.carloalbertoboano.com/documents/spoerk19ble5phy.pdf
[15] Morello, A., Chiasserini, C.-F., & Sérgio, R. (2020). IEEE 802.11-enabled wake-up radio: Use cases and applications. Sensors, 20(16), Article 4525. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6983094/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
