From "Digital Collection" to "Educational Scene": The Practical Logic of Red Culture Resource Databases Empowering Research-Based Learning

Authors

  • Yingmei Li
  • Yuchen Liu
  • Dongjin He

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/761dc805

Keywords:

Red Culture, Database, Research-Based Learning, Digital Collection, Educational Scene, Practical Logic

Abstract

 In the digital age, the protection and inheritance of red culture resources are undergoing a profound paradigm shift. Currently, a vast amount of red cultural resources has been digitized, forming large-scale "digital collections." However, this collection model, centered on data preservation, easily leads to the dilemmas of "data silos" and "disconnection between teaching and application," failing to meet the advanced demands of new-era research-based learning for experiential, interactive, and contextualized engagement. This article aims to explore the internal mechanism of the transformation of red culture resource databases from "digital collections" to "educational scenes." The study posits that this transformation is not a simple technological iteration but a profound transmutation of practical logic. Based on qualitative analysis and theoretical construction, the article proposes that this transformation relies on three interconnected practical logics: First, the reconstruction logic of data, shifting from fragmented data storage to semantic association based on knowledge graphs, laying the data foundation for scene construction. Second, the construction logic of scenes, moving from static digital presentation to immersive interaction based on Extended Reality (XR) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), achieving a sense of "presence" and "personalization." Third, the empowerment logic of research-based learning, transitioning from unidirectional knowledge infusion to deep participation and value creation covering the entire cycle (pre-, mid-, post-learning), ultimately realizing value identification and internalization. The conclusions of this study attempt to provide a theoretical reference for the digitized "activation" and utilization of red cultural resources and offer a feasible path for model innovation in research-based learning under the context of the "Big Ideological and Political Course."

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang, Z. (2023). Dilemmas and path innovations for integrating red cultural resources into ideological and political education in universities. School Party Building and Ideological Education, (10), 58-60.

[2] Cai, S., Liu, D., & Yu, F. (2024). "Learning Field" as a meta-theory of educational technology. Open Education Research, 30(1), 27-38.

[3] Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., et al. (2021). Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4), 1-37.

[4] Li, H., & Zhang, C. (2022). Construction and application of a knowledge graph of red literature from the perspective of digital humanities. Library Tribune, 42(5), 102-111.

[5] Lelyveld, P. V. (2020). Digital Storytelling: A Creator's Guide to Interactive Entertainment. CRC Press.

[6] Yan, Z., & Li, M. (2023). The reshaping of education by generative artificial intelligence: Challenges, opportunities, and future paths. China Educational Technology, (7), 1-8.

[7] Marxist Theory Research and Construction Engineering Key Textbooks. (2018). Principles of Ideological and Political Education. Higher Education Press.

[8] Slater, M. (2019). Place and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 28(2), 203-214.

[9] Gu, J., & Zhang, S. (2021). Research-based travel: Deep learning from "knowing" to "doing". Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, (4), 19-24.

[10] Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Downloads

Published

30-10-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, Y., Liu, Y., & He, D. (2025). From "Digital Collection" to "Educational Scene": The Practical Logic of Red Culture Resource Databases Empowering Research-Based Learning. Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management, 18(3), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.54097/761dc805